Friday, April 3, 2020

A Reminder that Politicians Only Know Politics

If you are like me you are mad as hell at Our Nance and Chuck the Schmuck and you are not going to take it any more.

But think of things from their point of view, particular from what they know.

What they know is campaigns, fundraising, and dealing with left-wing activist groups. And as I say, "politics is division." Also, "politics is civil war by other means."

They say that Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is the world's foremost expert at getting to a microphone first. And Nancy Pelosi must have some finely-honed skills related to getting to be Speaker of the House of Representatives and recruiting nice moderate Democratic candidates for moderate suburban Congressional Districts and jiggering around with fundraising and liberal activist groups.

But think about it. All they have come up with in the Four Years of Trump is witch-hunts and investigations. Really! That is all that you chaps could come up with!

When the Republican Senate was coming up with a $2 trillion stimulus bill Our Nance was back in California. Then she came back and demanded a bill that included lots of money and carve-outs for the activism community, making a priority out of diversity. Of course she did. That's all she knows.

And Chuck the Schmuck? He's busy blaming President Trump for everything. Of course he is. That's all he knows.

Meanwhile, today, President Trump is announcing the first "checks in the mail" in the government's small business rescue plan. 'Cos that's all he knows.

Some people are despondent because they see the China virus panic as another opportunity for the left to ratchet up government power. And put the country even further under centralized administrative control.

On the other hand others are despondent because they fear that the noble supra-national experiments like global trade and the EU are going to get a hammer blow from which they will never recover.

My approach is that the Great Reaction of the left over the last two centuries has been reaching its sell-by date for some time. Something, some day, is going to push it into the dustbin of history. Will this be it? Probably not. But it might create some cracks in the monolith.

I look at politicians like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and see people playing the old game, because that is what they know. I see the progressive left playing its political correctness game because that is what they have been carefully taught and that is what they know. And of course we have all the Good Little Girls in HR doing what they have been carefully taught and that is what they know. The reason that the tech lords at Google have been siding with the Democrats and silencing the "far-right" on social media is because that is what they have been carefully taught and what they know.

And the Oregon Court of Appeals upholds the conviction of a "far-right" journalist Mike Strickland who brandished a gun at "far-left" mostly peaceful protesters that were attacking him. Because that's all those appeals court judges know.

We humans go on doing what we know until our world collapses in front of us, according to scientists.

So we "far-right" racist-sexist-homophobes should be careful what we wish for. It's all very well to hope for "change," as our lefty friends say. But when "change" happens it also means that anything can happen.

And, when you think of all the things that could happen you have to know that most of them would be worse than the current situation.

So, the politicians, especially the late 70-something politicians, only know what they know. And so they do what they know.

Will they go on doing what they know until they pass on? Or will they be pushed?

I suppose it is up to us voters.

What I think, and nobody cares what I think, is that the current ruling Gentry class is not good for us Commoners, because they are setting rules for us that don't apply to them, because they are special.

I don't know that a ruling class that rules in the interest of Commoners would necessarily be good for America, or even good for Commoners. But as H.L. Mencken said, we Commoners would then at least be getting what we voted for, "good and hard."

Thursday, April 2, 2020

What Path Should We Follow?

I am working on a long think piece that is trying to solve the mystery of the meaning of life, the universe, and everything.

Of course, I am making the whole thing revolve around my reductive Three Peoples theory and the notion of three layers in general.

And, it seems to me, the whole thing comes down to "which path should we follow?" And naturally, it should be different for each of the Three Peoples. And, I propose, for each of them there is a good path and a bad path.

For the People of the Subordinate Self -- and for Curtis Yarvin's Clients -- the path is obvious; it is Follow your Leader. But, of course, you should understand that your Leader, whether the tribal leader, the Olympian gods, or President-for-life Xi, doesn't really care about people like you. He is using you as a path to power. You are, as I say, a Little Darling, like the mistress of a rich guy, who is liable to age out and get dropped. And it is one thing to follow your traditional tribal leader and another thing to follow some chap like Adolf Hitler with some cockeyed notion of world domination. But how do you tell? Good question.

For the People of the Responsible Self -- and for Curtis Yarvin's Commoners -- the path is: Follow the Rules. At the prosaic level this is the "obey the law, go to work, follow the rules" that I first heard from FoxNews Sean Hannity. At the higher end it is the notion of God's Divine Law, and the Paradise that await believers that follow the Divine Law. But, obviously, there is a limit to this. Do you damn to personal hell someone that doesn't follow your rules? Do you belong to a church with very rigid rules and roles? Following the Rules is the center of the market economy, where everyone follows the rules and is trustworthy, and where we make our living by working for others, whether as an employee or as an entrepreneur that makes his money by making products and services demanded by the market.

So far so good. But now we come to the People of the Creative Self -- and Curtis Yarvin's Gentry. Whatabout them? Well, I know what I want to say. The path of the creative is the path of the Sacrificial Hero. Then there is the other guy, who Jordan B. Peterson calls the "eternal adversary." Let us expand on Peterson's notion of the Hostile Brothers.
One of these "hostile brothers" or "eternal sons of God" is the mythological hero. He faces the unknown with the presumption of its benevolence -- with the (unprovable) attitude that confrontation with the unkown will bring renewal and redemption. He enter[s], voluntarily, into creative "union with the Great Mother," builds or regenerates society, and brings peace to a warring world.
The other "son of God" is the eternal adversary. This "spirit on unbridled rationality," horrified by his limited apprehension of the conditions of existence, shrinks from contact with everything he does not understand. This shrinking... makes him rigid and authoritarian... His weakness, in combination with his neurotic suffering, engenders resentment and hatred for existence itself.
Peterson calls these Hostile Brothers "archetypes of response to the unknown." I consider the mythological hero as the Sacrifical Hero, and the eternal adversary as the Egoist Hero. And it occurs to me that the path of the Sacrificial Hero is the Path into the Unknown. The true hero has the courage and the humility to follow the path of the Unknown, and accept the fear of the Unknown as a fact of life. The eternal adversary wants to make the Unknown known before he is willing to take th path into the future. And this is why the past two centuries is littered with ideological narratives that pretend to resolve the question of the Unknown: Comte's Positivism, Marx's Communism, the Frankfurt School's postmodernism, the Wokerati's political correctness.

I would say that the story of the last century is the story of the Gentry failing to face up to the frightful truth of the creative life, that it is a journey into the Unknown -- where there be dragons. The Gentry wants its creative life on the cheap, paid for by the Commoners. Or it wants to practice its creative notions on the Commoners, because Gentry is special and Commoners are deplorable. You can see these conceits in everything the left does, from socialism to politics to art. It is all a denial of the truth of the creative life, that it is a terrifying journey into the Unknown.

You can see that Nietzsche had a glimmering of this truth; that is why he proposes his Übermensch who is brave, creative, able to handle "a fair amount of accidents and nonsense," who is bigger than the descent from decadence to nihilism and the terror of the eternal recurrence in the hope of a future of ascending strength and achievement. But I think that there is probably too much of the Egoist Hero in Nietzsche's Übermensch to qualify him as a true Sacrifical Hero that walks, overcoming his fear, into the Unknown.

So that's all settled.

If you are one of the People of the Subordinate Self you follow the path in the footsteps of your Leader.

If you are one of the People of the Responsible Self you follow the Rules.

If you are one of the People of the Creative Self you follow the path into the Unknown.

Wednesday, April 1, 2020

The Clear Pill - Table of Contents

An Analysis of Curtis Yarvin's Three Layer Theory

1. Curtis Yarvin's Clear Pill: The Uses of the "Political Formula"
It could produce a "third story" to upend the Gentry

2. Curtis Yarvin's Clear Pill: How to Keep the Woke Gentry Onside
Take away the power; then the Gentry will behave

3. Applying Yarvin's Gentry Commoners Clients to Charles Murray's "Coming Apart"
And other three class theories of society

4. My Three Peoples vs. Yarvin's Three Layers
My Creatives, Responsibles, Subordinates vs. his Gentry, Commoners, and Clients

5. "Why Liberalism Works" for the Gentry
But not necessarily for Commoners and Clients

6. Could Chile's Collapse Happen Here?
It could, except we Commoners have Donald Trump in our lane

7. It's Past Time for Merely Defending the Market System. Etc.
Why not go on the attack

8. Why Is Everyone Going Crazy?
Because the progressive project is splitting at the seams

9. What Path Should We Follow?
It depends on what kind of person you are

10. A Reminder that Politicians Only Know Politics
Pelosi and Schumer don't know any better

11. Mrs. Poyser and the Plague of Karens
Nagging and complaining work in the home but not in the public square

12. How Do You Counter the Gentry's "Anthems"
Short of a revolution?

13. Elon Musk Schools the Karens
It's a gender -- and a class -- thing

Communism - Table of Contents

Communism: An Analysis

Table of Contents:

  1. Communism Week: Europe in the 1840s
    Of course educated youth thought the world was going to hell

  2. Communism Week: Marx's Economic Errors
    Capitalism does not lead to "immiseration" and production for profit is not oppressive

  3. Communism Week: Marx's War on the Bourgeoisie
    Marx thought the bourgeoisie wanted power. But it didn't

  4. Communism Week: The Problem with Political Power
    We would like to soften the terror of the marketplace. But political power is not the way

  5. Communism Week: The Real Revolution of the Modern Age
    Scientists have provided tools for us to deal with the terrors of the universe and the market

  6. Communism Week: My Perfect Plan
    Teach migrants the ways of the city, and teach creatives tolerance towards the bourgeoisie

  7. Real Critical Theory: How About a Critique of Leftism
    You mean my Three Peoples theory, my critique of activism, my Little Darlings notion, etc.?

  8. Whither the Culture War Now?
    We must teach the creatives to be tolerant, and bravely walk the line between Order and Chaos

Critical Theory -- Table of Contents

A Critique of Critical Theory
  1. Critical Theory: Not Just a Punching Bag

  2. Time for Conservative Critical Theory

  3. Critiquing Obama from the Enlightened Left

  4. Government Professor Attacks Austrian Economics

  5. "How Can You Tell a Racist?"

  6. It's Not Time for Reading Books, It's Time for Action

  7. The Story So Far, from Juergen Habermas

  8. Adorno: Cultural Marxism Isn't All Bad

  9. Obama's Phone-and-Pen Politics is a Weakness, not a Strength

  10. How to Turn Left Through Modernism and Postmodernism

  11. Frankfurters for Breakfast

  12. Frankfurt School Analysis, Part Two

  13. Yes, Liberals, Critical Theory Applies to Your Ideas Too

  14. What's All This About Treason?

  15. Real Critical Theory: How About a Critique of Leftism

  16. Anti-Barker: Don't Know Much About Philosophee

  17. No, Critical Theorists, Creativity is Not The Only Thing

  18. The German Turn: How Germans Invented the Modern World

  19. My "1584 Project"

  20. Let's Kritik Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality

  21. White Privilege vs. Little Darlings

  22. How About a Critique of Critique?

  23. Towards a Critique of Meaning

  24. Against Kimball: Science Advances by Breaking the Rules

Double Revolution - Table of Contents

The Double Revolution: in Physics and the Economy
  1. Communism Week: The Real Revolution of the Modern Age
    Two revolutions, in physics and the economy

  2. The Counterrevolutions of the Modern Age
    Communism-socialism and environmentalism for a start

  3. The Two Heads of the Forces of Lefty Reaction
    "Activism" and neo-feudalism, for a start

  4. The Two Heads of Reaction: How Do We Deal With Them
    Against neo-tribalism of identity politics the nation state; against neo-feudalism the corporation

  5. The Great Reaction Also Includes Neo-Sacrifice
    Neo-sacrifice is what totalitarianism is all about

Doughnut Economics -- Contents

Analysis and Commentary on Kate Raworth's Doughnut Economics

Analysis

  1. Doughnunt Economics: For Well-born Activists

  2. Doughnut Economics: Forget GDP; See the Big Picture

  3. Doughnut Economics: Human Nurture and System Complexity

  4. Doughnut Economics: Redistribute, Regenerate

  5. Doughnut Economics: Growth Agnostic

Commentary

  1. Doughnut Economics: Springtime for Activists