A liberal friend confided the other day that Democrats were having a problem communicating with the American people about God.
I replied: Well of course. Liberals champion the Enlightenment. Their political party, the Democratic Party, is the secular party.
That is essentially what Senator Obama confirmed to a group of well-heeled San Francisco liberals when he excused the “bitterness” of working-class voters in Pennsylvania and the rust belt.
It’s not surprising that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment. . . .
And it’s not surprising that Obama would say this to a bunch of San Francisco Democrats. That’s what elite liberals believe and what they say to each other in their faculty lounges, in their activist meetings, and in their liberal churches.
In this view of reality, of course, liberals are the enlightened ones that are able to mediate between the cruel world and the helpless bitterness of their victim constituents. Liberals compassionately provide programs to ease the pain.
Against this “conventional wisdom,” to use the words of the most conventional liberal of them all, John Kenneth Galbraith, are the words of a Chinese man, a “Dr. Wu.” His words are retailed by David Aiken in Jesus in Beijing, a study of Christianity in China.
(It is an astonishing story.)
For years, decades, “Dr. Wu” said, the Chinese people have wondered what made the West so powerful. What was it, the magic bullet that had allowed the upstart West to dominate and humiliate China, the Middle Kingdom, most ancient and most glorious of civilizations?
At first, we thought it was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity. That is why the West is so powerful.
Obviously there is a powerful disconnect between “Dr. Wu” and the conventional liberal position, shared by presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), that religion is merely a superstition for frightened and bitter minds.
But that just raises another question. What is it about Christianity that makes it so powerful? And if it so powerful, why are liberals driving it out of the public square?
No comments:
Post a Comment